Back To Top

  Top

Home ServicesAbout ERCOFProjectsConferences

 Silang Conference Executive Summary


A CONFERENCE ON PROGRAMS TO HARNESS THE RESOURCES OF OVERSEAS FILIPINOS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL ECONOMIES
JULY 16 – 18, 2003 Silang, Cavite

 

 

 DAY 0: 16 JULY 2003

A. Registration of Participants ( 5:00 to 7:00 PM )

B. Welcome Dinner ( 7:00 PM )

 DAY 1: 17 JULY 2003

A. Continuation of Registration ( 7:00 to 7:30 AM )

B. Arrival of the Conference Keynote Speaker, Honorable Teofisto T. Guingona, Vice-President of the Republic of the Philippines.

C. Welcome Ceremonies; Singing of the National Anthem of the Republic of the Philippines; Ecumenical Invocation.

D. Welcome Remarks by Honorable Ruben M. Madlangsakay, Mayor of the Municipality of Silang, Province of Cavite.

Conferences Papers News Links Funding Contact Us

 
 Related Information  

 

Mayor Madlangsakay acknowledged the critical role played by the local government, particularly the local police and the barangay officials & personnel in ensuring peace and order in the community which created a favorable climate for business. He commended the conference organizers for focusing on directing Overseas Filipinos investments and savings to the development of local / rural economies. The objective of the conference, he adds, which is to explore programs to assist the Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) in harnessing their resources (i.e., to save and invest in the rural areas where they come from) is of vital importance as the safety nets provided by the national government are very narrow.

E. Introduction of the Keynote Speaker by Victor M. Arguelles, Member of the Board of Trustees, ERCOF Philippines.

Mr. Arguelles characterized the Keynote Speaker as a fighter all throughout his life as a public servant, who fought against the oppressors in defense of human rights during the Martial Law years of the Philippines and who was in the forefront until the people power struggle of EDSA 1; he also fought against graft and corruption in government; and has now trained his sights against the inequities of globalization.

F. Keynote Address of Honorable Teofisto T. Guingona, Vice-President of the Republic of the Philippines.

The Vice-President recognized the members of the Board of Trustees of ERCOF Philippines and the other luminaries who were present in the Conference. He underscored the vital contribution of the 8 million Overseas Filipinos, who are scattered in at least 150 countries worldwide, in preventing negative growth of the Philippine national economy. He estimates that their collective annual remittance reached $8 billion dollars, which figure that would likely be double if we include the remittances that do not pass the formal banking channels. As of the 1st Quarter of 2003, overseas remittances powered the 23% growth in the net income from abroad and fuelled the 4.9% growth in personal consumption. While they do not work here, OFWs generate employment by their investment in micro enterprises, which compose 90% of the country’s industry sector. These small and medium enterprises employ 20% of the Philippines labor force.

Our expression of gratitude for this invaluable contribution of our migrants workers must go beyond words and encouragement but also through programs and projects, which will benefit them and their families, the Vice-President emphasized.

Before we harness OFWs resources, we should gear them towards competitiveness and greater capacities, he adds. By doing so, they can do more for themselves and for their communities.

He enumerated the various programs for the welfare of OFWs, which he initiated during his stint as the Secretary of Foreign Affairs:


1. Seafarers Program

This is the establishment of a one-stop shop for seafarers that made available to them education and livelihood modules as well as housing satellite offices of different manning agencies that will facilitate their employment and travel abroad.

2. OFW Housing Program

A housing program that will make use of government lands for the housing needs of OFWs and government workers, which will be more affordable, and with a longer amortization period.

3. Overseas Filipinos Investment Bonds.

A savings vehicle that will pay a higher interest rate than time deposits in commercial banks and with bonds denominated at US $ 100.00 each. OFWs will be asked to donate a portion of their proceeds for social services that will benefit migrants such as legal consultations, services of social workers, discounted health insurance and skills upgrading.

4. Absentee Voting Law

This will, for the first time, allow OFWs the right to vote leaders to public service. If they are able to organize themselves, they will be in a position to influence policies, both national and local.

Lastly, the Vice-President informed the participants of the potential impact of the forthcoming WTO Conference in Cancun, which may discuss opening up access of labor across borders and allowing foreigners to be treated equally with locals in certain professions. He cautioned against making rush decisions that will disadvantage the country and threaten certain professions because of technological and skill advantage of foreigners.


G. Photo Opportunity with the Vice-President / Departure

H. Self Introduction of the Participants

I. Video Film Show: Voices of Overseas Filipinos.

SESSION 1: Migration and Development and the Potential of Remittances

J. Objectives of the Conference presented by Atty. Ding F. Bagasao, Chair, ERCOF Philippines.

Ding Bagasao emphasized that the Conference intends to explore how the country and its people could reap the benefits of migration. He cited the potential available from the efforts of 8 million overseas Filipinos living and working in various capacities in about 193 countries worldwide. While remittances amounting to 7 billion or more US dollars annually have helped millions of families to survive and benefited the Philippine government by enabling the national economy from falling into bankruptcy, certain gut questions have to be answered: How long will these labor markets exist? Are we prepared to handle our overseas workers who are forced to return because of growing restrictions of host countries due to economic recession, nationalization of labor programs, and other factors? How long will we allow families have to live apart? Are we going to be eternally dependent on foreign labor markets for our national economy’s sustainability? Have we lost our ability to believe in ourselves or in our capacity to be self-sufficient?

The Davao Conference of 2002 or Ercof 1 surfaced limited public awareness of the development potential of remittances and even lesser knowledge of how this could be done. That conference ended with the participants committing themselves. As it appears in the Conference Statement, to integrate a migrant economic agenda into their work and vowed to turn into a movement the concept of migration for development. A technical working group composed of representatives from the five sectors that attended the conference was convened to carryout this plan.

There is now a need to study, offer and implement concrete mechanisms and systems that could lead to the strategic use of migrant resources that may jumpstart local development. This is what Ercof 2 will offer. Why do we believe that LGUs should be an active stakeholder in this scheme? Because we believe that the core of local economy development is community or lgu-based. Improvements in the economic situation in the lgu level will redound to the benefit of the national economy.

This Conference or Ercof 2 has the following as its objectives:

1. Study and propose mechanisms towards the strategic use of migrant resources for local development.

2. Sharing of existing practices through presentation of case studies.

3. Share OFW organizations needs regarding the utilization of resources.

4. Surface the reaction of the Department of Interior and Local Government regarding the utilization of migrant resources and investments for local development.

5. Brainstorm on available mechanisms for self-sufficiency of beneficiaries.

6. Hear from presentors what are possible mechanisms to enable migrant resources to impact on local economies.


K. “Making Use of the Four Resources of Migration for Developing the Philippine Economy” presented by Mr. Neil G. Ruiz, Ph.D. Candidate in Political Economy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Mr. Ruiz expressed great interest for the purpose of the Conference, as he himself is a product of Filipino parents who decided to migrate to the United States. He gave the participants an overview of his presentation by enumerating the 3 main questions that he hopes to answer, that is;

a. What are the four resources of migration?
b. How are the various governments, NGOs and private networks around the world dealing with these four resources?
c. How can these resources be used for development?

The four resources of migration can be divided into 2 main groups: Resources of the Migrant and Resources of the Sending Country.

The first resource of migrants is Remittances which benefit the sending country’s economy through influx of much needed foreign exchange. For the migrant’s family, this means a steady flow of income for their day-to-day requirements and a possible surplus that may be used for investment purposes. In turn these benefits the local community in the form of capital for new businesses and development projects. The Philippines is the third highest recipient of remittances from its migrants, next only to India and Mexico (based on 2000 IMF data). For the same year, remittances constituted almost 10% of the country’s Gross Domestic Product.

The second resource of migrants is themselves when they Return. In an ideal setting, this will mean making use of the new skills they have acquired abroad and the business networks they have developed in favor of the local economy. However, if most of the sending country’s migrants belong to the unskilled category, this may result into difficulties as there may be no jobs available as well as social and familial problems arising from joblessness. Recruitment, the third resource, is equally beneficial for the sending country as it decreases the unemployment rate and stabilizes wages in the domestic labor market. For receiving countries, this provides them relief from labor shortages as well as acquiring a labor pool of migrants who are willing to do jobs that are “undesirable” to locals. The fourth resource is that migration surfaces the need for Representation, for the migrants voice in both sending and receiving countries and the imperative to have them participate in the formulation of national policies through the exercise of the right to suffrage.

The capture and full utilization of these four resources of migration require a conscious effort at building linkages between the different agents: Migrants; Sending Government; NGOs & other Advocacy Groups; Private Industries; Venture Capitalists; and members of the Academe.

L. “Remittance Situationer and Analysis” presented by Dr. Roberto de Vera, Director, Regional Strategies Group, University of Asia and the Pacific.

Dr. de Vera emphasized two main points: (1) That we should take care of our OFWs, they are our most important resource, and not to reduce them to simply a source of foreign currency. There must be an effort to help them develop a culture of savings (for migrants and their dependents), for them to realize not to splurge their earnings into consumer goods. (2) A national approach in analyzing remittance and spending patterns may not be effective for data indicates variances in regional markets.

He stated that the Philippines is in the verge of a demographic dividend (“balato”) or payback period where the labor force is growing faster than child and elderly dependents. Statistics presented indicate that our population will increase by 32.8 million by the year 2020, and of this figure 22.8 M will be joining the labor force as against 6.2 million child dependents & 3.8-M elderly dependents. In other words, for every 100 persons that become dependents, there will be 227 possible workers to support these dependents. Thus there is an urgent task for the private sector, LGUs and NGOs is to help these 32.8-M workers-to-be find good jobs.

He likewise presented the following OFW demographics: 17.4% of our country’s Households (HH) have at least 1 OFW; Based on 2000 statistics, these OFW HH spent PHP 460 Billion; 64 % of these OFW HH are located in urban areas & 36% in rural areas; in terms of educational attainment, 59% of our OFWs are below high school, 24% are hs graduates and 17% are college graduates. However, recent trends in the international labor market indicate that there is a growing demand more skilled occupations (such as nursing, caregiving & the teaching profession) which will require higher level educational backgrounds. In terms of regional breakdowns, OFW HHs in the NCR region were the highest spenders (33.2%) followed by Southern Tagalog (18.3%) and Central Luzon (11.5%);

M. “Potentials of OFW and LGU Partnership and Counterparting Programs on Local Development” presented by Honorable Austere Panadero, Asst. Secretary of the Department of Interior and Local Government.

In response to the conference organizer’s invitation seeking to elicit the department’s thoughts on how LGUs can be stakeholders in a partnership with OFWs, he emphasized that local economic development is now the strategic concern of a growing number of LGUs. He also expressed his elation over the fact that the conference is now talking of OFW involvement in the development of the local economy, a dramatic change from previous years’ experiences where OFW contributions were allocated to small projects such as building of waiting sheds or welcome arcs.

Where can OFWs help? He focused on the issue of water access and distribution. There are a big number of municipalities now laboring under the problem of access to potable water. This is a potentially viable investment area for OFWs as water districts need infusion of capital in order to expand the infrastructure is already existing. Another area is livelihood projects were there are already existing partnerships among LGUs, NGOs, MFIs and commercial banks in certain cases. This is not solely about financing but also involves building infrastructure to develop skills. Thus, OFWs may consider investing in the PCFC; bond floatation’s; and the municipal development fund which is handled by the Department of Finance. The recent legislation, the Barangay Micro Enterprise Law (BMBE) involves an effort of several government agencies (Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of Science and Technology, and with Dept. of Trade & Industry, as the lead agency) are looking into viable enterprises, identifying commodities and common programs concerning products. Presently, they have identified 2 major products: coconut & aquamarine as viable commodities.

N. Lunch Break


SESSION II: Harnessing Remittances for Local Development (Case Studies)


Non-Government Organizations (NGOs)


O. The Unlad-Kabayan Migrant Services, Inc. Experience presented by Ms. May-an Villalba, Executive Director.

The organization was established in 1994 as a program of the Asian Migrant Center, and NGO based in Hong Kong. After years of organizing migrants and providing various services to help them cope with their problems, the AMC realized that the long-term solution to migration is: (a) savings mobilization among migrant workers, and (b) building alternative investments at home. This reintegration scheme is to prepare migrant workers for their eventual return and at the same time create small enterprises at home. These small business enterprises will help create new jobs for migrants’ families and communities, and eventually for themselves should their contract be terminated suddenly. This program was set up in the Philippines in 1996 and has become a model for other labor sending countries. The twin strategies adopted by Unlad Kabayan are: Migrant Savings for Alternative Investments (MS-AI) and Social Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurs Development Services (SEEDS).

The organization’s programs: Savings and Investment Generation, Enterprise Development and Advocacy are geared towards the economic empowerment of migrants of migrants and their families which starts with a paradigm shift from reliance on remittances to entrepreneurship which will pave the way for the migrant to transform himself/herself from an employee to a job provider.

P. The Atikha/Balikkabayani Experience presented by Ms. Mai Anonuevo, Executive Director.

The term “atikha” is a local term meaning “the gradual accumulation of an amount by saving” while “balikabayani” refers to a person in the act of returning to his country for a vacation or for good. The organization adopted these local terms, as they were appropriate to the objectives of the organization, which are:

(a) to decrease the dependency of the families of OFWs on migrant savings,
(b) to provide services for OFWs and their families,
(c) to assist in capital build-up of OFWs and create economic opportunities for OFW returnees, their families and communities, and,
(d) to increase self-reliance of Atikha.

The organization adopted a twin-pronged strategy consisting of: (1) a convergence initiative for an integrated OFW reintegration in a pilot area, and (2) the setting up a national reintegration program with other stakeholders and replication of the pilot experience.


Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs)

Q. The Samal Island Integrated Mariculture Project presented by Mr. Ramon Naguita of SIFDC/SIFOWDEMCO.

The Samal Island Overseas Filipinos & Dependents Multi-Purpose Cooperative mariculture project involves the raising of mud crabs in Brgy. Balet, Samal Island. This is a cooperative effort among the following partners: SIFOWDEMCO, the Federation of Overseas Filipino Workers of Region 11 (composed of 33 groups), the Brgy. Balet fisherfolk, the LGU of Samal Island, the Davao Del Norte State College, and the Overseas Filipinos Worldwide Investment and Management Corporation (represented by Tonnette Binsol). This project is a concrete example of the type of partnership that the conference promotes which will benefit the local economy of Samal Island including its small farmers and fisherfolk.

R. FARMCOOP Experience presented by Atty. Koronado Apuzen.

The Foundation for Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Cooperatives in Mindanao is a social development organization committed to provide agrarian reform beneficiaries, small farmers and indigenous peoples cooperatives and associations effective support services for sustainable agriculture, market linkage, technological advancement, among others.

They have organized and empowered exploited cooperatives of agrarian reform beneficiaries and small farmers in the banana industry resulting into the abrogation of onerous contracts with multinational corporations and helped them manage their own farms. The result of this initiative changed the situation of these small farmers from poverty to economic bounty. The cooperatives them formed FEDCO (Federation of Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Banana Based Cooperatives of Davao) for the following purposes: (1) bulk buying of farm inputs to sell to coops at a cheaper price, (2) direct trading and marketing of bananas not committed to corporate growers and multinational corporations, and (3) the production of plastic used in the growing and packaging of bananas. FEDCO then entered into a joint venture with a Japanese corporation and formed MOVE (Mindanao Organic Ventures Enterprises) which was responsible for the export and international marketing of bananas.

Atty. Apuzen encouraged OFWs to invest in the banana industry the market for the product has been increasing over the years. He also laid-out the economics of investing in the industry. He likewise cited the opportunities presented by herbal medicine, primarily, sambong and presented the potential income of investing in this area.

S. Break

T. Fil-IT / Overseas Filipinos Worldwide Investment & Management Corporation presented by Ms. Tonette Binsol.

Tonette introduced herself as a member of FIL-IT, a network of Filipinos connected through the Internet. From this cyberspace network and after meeting with Mon Naguita on the occasion of the Ercof conference in Davao, was born the OFWIMC, founded on the concept of e-trust. The organization was able to raise 10 million pesos for investment in the Samal Island Mariculture Project. From an initial discussion group of about 100 individuals/investor, OFWIMC now stands as a SEC registered corporation composed of overseas Filipinos who share the vision of investing their savings in local economic projects. This is a concrete example of the Filipino trust for each other despite the fact that their members have not seen each other physically nor have met together as a group other than communicating with each other on cyberspace. The group is now looking into other economic opportunities for investment.

U. WORKSHOP 1

The participants were divided into smaller groups of around 10 to 12 persons to discuss and present in plenary their conclusions on the following questions:

• Based on your own experiences, what are the existing practices/linkages/forms of cooperation between and among the OFW-LGU-NGO-Media-Academe-Financial Institutions in harnessing remittances/resources for local development/local economy. Are there other stakeholders that have cooperation with OFWs in harnessing remittances and resources?

• What are the needs/concerns/issues arising from such practices?

• What steps/measures have been taken to address these needs and concerns? Are there other recommendations to address these?

 DAY 2: 18 JULY 2003

A. Recap/Synthesis of the Previous Day

See the Synthesis document attached herein as ANNEX “A”.

B. Plenary (Presentation of Outputs of Workshop 1)

See the Summary and the Group Outputs attached herein as ANNEXES “B” and “C”.


SESSION III: Mechanisms to Maximize Migrant Remittances


C. “Overseas Filipino Savings and Investments in Microfinance” presented by Mr. Josaias T. Dela Cruz, President and Chief Operating Officer, Opportunity Microfinance Bank

The presentation consisted of 2 major parts. The first part dealt with the question: What is the role of microfinance in the development of the local economy?

The first portion discussed the general principles of microfinance. Microfinance is the provision of a broad range of financial services (deposits, loans, payment services, money transfer & insurance products) to the poor & low-income households and their microenterprises. The clients of microfinance are the economically active and entrepreneurial poor (e-poor). These clients have a stable economic activity in the informal sector and will be able to sustain and enhance that activity if they are provided with even a small amount of readily available funds. These micro entrepreneurs are the basic unit of the local economy.

What are the principles of microfinance?

1. The poor need sustained access to financial services & products.
2. The poor have the capacity to pay (repayment rate is 98%) and to save.
3. Microfinance institutions can be operationally and financially self-sufficient.

The objective of microfinance is to start the poor interested in small livelihood activities or microenterprises then graduate them to bigger businesses. This will help create employment and money generated will go to help out other entrepreneurial activities. Thus, microfinance is the oil that greases the economy.

APPEND or the Alliance of Philippine Partners in Enterprise Development, Inc., is the first and most recognized network of microfinance organizations in the Philippines with 10 affiliated NGOs and one thrift bank. It has 99 outreach areas in 53 provinces nationwide. As a network organization, it provides its members: training and technical assistance for institution building, leadership training and development, bridging loans, and monitoring & supervision of project grants.

What then is the role of the Overseas Filipinos in the development of the local economy?

Overseas Filipinos(OFS) should be encouraged not only to send remittances for consumption purposes but to send a portion of their remittance as capital for small and medium enterprises.

This conference highlights the opportunity for OFs to invest in microfinance, as MFIs (microfinance institutions) have proven successful operations can be ran sustainably and that it can generate revenue and even profit. It is hoped that the private market would be attracted to saving or investing in MFIs through their demonstration of financial profitability while simultaneously alleviating the plight of the poor. Estimated market demand for microfinance is enormous. The market becomes larger if unemployment increases and more people become self-employed.

OFs can look to Opportunity Microfinance Bank (OMB) as a channel for savings and investments. The OF can consider the option of being a Kabalikat Depositor with OMB and their deposits will be directed single-mindedly to microfinance development. Every Php 5,000.00 deposit that stays with the bank will enable another family to rise out of poverty by the funding of a microenterprise activity, aside of course, from the deposit earning interest. Other mechanisms that OFs may avail of are remitting money through OMB (an accredited agent of Uniteller) and/or investing in OMB preferred shares for various capitalization for greater outreach and expansion.

A partnership is now being forged between ERCOF and APPEND, that will provide a mechanism for channeling investment dollars of Overseas Filipinos to support microfinance while at the same time providing a good return. This mechanism is inspired by the Thembani International Guarantee Fund, which is a newly created financial vehicle through which South Africa’s overseas investors can participate in building up the economic structure that supports the country’s nascent political democracy.

D. “The MILAMDEC Microfinance Experience” presented by Fr. Terry Barcelon S.J., Executive Director, Milamdec Foundation, Xavier University.
Fr. Barcelon presented a profile of the potential client base for microfinance operations. This is 40% of the Philippine population living in poverty which translates into 6 to 8 million families who are in need of the following services: credit facilities, savings services & insurance (loans, death, health). In an effort to cope with their situation, the poor operate microenterprises as a source of livelihood, which is characterized by a cycle involving production, marketing-sales, and collection. Microfinance provides these entrepreneurial poor with access to credit without need of collateral with weekly collections involving small and affordable amounts. To insure payment, the institution applies the principle of TDK – tutok, dikit, at kulit.

MILAMDEC, Northern Mindanao has at present 14,000 members organized into 14 branches. Its average collection rate for the past 11 years (1992 – 2003) is 94%. Milamdec has just recently received its certificate from the BSP to operate a rural bank. This opens new avenues as it will allow them to avail of loan facility from BSP as well as receive money as deposits. The Milamdec experience has belied the following myths:

a. The poor do not pay loans.
b. Filipinos cannot unite or cooperate.
c. Filipinos do not look long range.

E. “The Abra Overseas Filipino Workers Center” presented by the first lady Mayor of Bangued, Abra the Honorable Zita Valera.

The Abra Overseas Filipino Workers Center was established by virtue of a provincial board resolution and was opened in 1997. It is the only local government initiated provincial-based program and is guided by providing a host of services to OFWs and their families before, during and after their deployment for work abroad. Some of the services provided by the Center include:

1. Information campaigns geared towards orienting province mates who are seriously considering foreign employment about the do’s and don’t’s of overseas employment, and even providing them with a primer to guide them while in a foreign land.

2. Ensure the legitimacy of placement and recruitment agencies by ensuring that they are accredited with the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration.

3. Provide free legal assistance; provide free phone calls during emergencies.

4. Coordinate with the DFA, Consular Offices abroad, and foreign NGOs (such as CARAM Asia), whenever there is an Abranian abroad who is in trouble and is in need of assistance.

5. They maintain a directory of Abranians who are OFWs and maintain a province wide coordinative network consisting of municipal coordinators who can facilitate the provision of notice and information to OFW families in cases of emergencies.

The Center became a personal commitment on the part of the speaker after her May 1997 visit of Hong Kong to grace a celebration of the Abranians working there. The occasion turned into one of grief when they received the news of a province mate who fell from the 4th floor of the residential apartment she was working in and was declared dead. The OFW concerned just arrived in Hong Kong 4 days before the incident. The Mayor, then the Governor of Abra, came to the realization that most of the OFWs hide their real face and situation behind a smiling mask, a face that spoke of loneliness, despair and helplessness. She then resolved to put up the Center as a tribute to the new day heroes.

OFWs and their families represent a big sector in the provincial population: 15,000 OFWs. If this number is multiplied by 5 (the average number of members of a Filipino family), this means 75,000 of the 200,000 population of Abra are OFWs & dependents. In terms of monthly remittances, these OFWs remit an average of 50 million pesos (based on a survey made with the participation of the 4 commercial banks located in Bangued).

The Mayor hopes that in time this cycle of labor export will stop but realizes that this may not come to pass if the local economy will not be able to provide gainful employment to OFWs and their family members. They have seen a pattern of family members (mostly women) pursuing the same course of overseas employment because o the inability to save and invest in productive forms of livelihood. Because of these, she has considered the issuance of an OFW bond that will spur a savings culture and provide the returning OFWs with entrepreneurial capital upon maturity. The revenue generated from this bond float can be invested by the municipality into income generating activities and structures.

She expressed her elation for the invitation by Ercof which linked her to participants that share her commitment and dream to improve the lives of our OFWs and their families.

F. “Developing Market Linkages” presented by Mr. Victor Tanchoco, Trustee, ERCOF Philippines

Mr. Tanchoco’s presentation is descriptive of the potential of converting Overseas Filipinos (OFs) from the traditional role of remitters of foreign currency to their respective families for consumption purposes (estimated at 80% of amount remitted) into entrepreneurs engaged in the buying and selling foreign and local products.

OF families regularly purchase products for consumption, products which are also available in the country’s where their OF family member is currently working/residing. The local costs of these products in the retail market are generally higher than in the foreign countries where these products or its equivalent can be found. Mr. Tanchoco proposes OF take the role as buyers of these consumables for export into the Philippines. He estimates that this alternative will result into consumption savings of up to Php 3 billion. Reduced consumption expenses will result into increased income and investment capital for OF families. This savings/investment capital can then be invested in a provincial level distribution center to enhance market traffic with barangay-based retail outlets.

Mr. Tanchoco goes further and proposes to make use of this distribution mechanism/network to transform OFs into entrepreneurs in their host countries selling Philippine products. Concretely, barangay outlets can assume the role of purchasers of specific locally produced items, which would then be housed or stocked in the facilities of the provincial level distribution centers. These products can then be exported to the foreign countries where OFs are based for retail selling. This will result into increase foreign currency income of OFs that can be pooled into an investible fund for allocation into local business opportunities, including the further enhancement of the operations of distribution centers.


G. Break


H. “Programs of the World Bank on Countryside Development” presented by Mr. Raul Gonzalez, Participation Specialist.

Mr. Gonzalez talked about the Country Assistance Strategy of the Bank for the years 200 – 2005. This strategy is focused on: (a) helping governments re-establish rapid and sustained poverty reducing growth, and (b) ensure that the poor participate in the benefit fully from development. Development herein refers to community-driven development (CDD) which is characterized by the active involvement by communities in the design, implementation and management of projects. The speaker admits that it has taken the Bank several decades to adopt the development framework approach used by NGOs since the very beginning. Now fifty percent of the World Bank’s Philippine Program is CDD.

What are the basic premises of community-driven development?

1. Development is more likely to be effective and sustaining when communities are actively engaged in the activities that affect them.

2. By responding to their priorities, communities will be more committed to the development activity, more willing to maintain the assets created and better able, over time, to direct their own future.

3. Communities that feel empowered will be better able to demand effective and transparent services from their local governments.

Major characteristics of Community-Driven Projects:

1. The focus is on the poorest local government units and communities, selected by objective (not political) criteria.

2. Participation is demand driven.

3. Sub-project selection is bottom-up: sub-projects financed are proposed by communities themselves.

4. Selection of sub-projects is based on a menu of options, ranging from an open-menu to a more limited menu.

5. There is cost-sharing by the communities themselves and local governments.

Mr. Gonzalez identified a specific 5-year CDD Project: the KALAHI – CIDSS (Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan - Comprehensive and Integrated Delivery of Support Services: Kapangyarihan at Kaunlaran sa Barangay). The objectives of the Project are: (a) to empower Communities, (b) improve local governance and people’s access to their government, and (c) support community investment projects through the provision of seed funds. The Project components include; social preparation, capacity building & implementation support, community grants and monitoring & evaluation. The Project beneficiaries will be all barangays in the poorest 25% municipalities in the poorest 40 provinces in the country.
The significant results of the Barangay projects in Dolores, Quezon indicate that:

1. Estimated economic internal rate of return is between 17% and 53%, (which is very high by WB standards).

2. Despite high quality, construction costs are estimated at 2 – 3 times less than the standard GOP construction costs.

3. Generated construction jobs for 72 local people.

4. Trained over 150 local volunteers who will serve as a pool of future leaders in Dolores.

5. Amount of local contributors is almost equal to funds provided by the Project.

I. “Overseas Filipino Trust Fund” presented by Dr. Sixto K. Roxas, Chair, Maximo T. Kalaw Institute for Sustainable Development and Preferred Ventures.

Dr. Roxas admits that he comes into this Conference wearing two hats. Firstly, he works with the Office of the Vice-President of the Philippines, in particular, as a consultant to the “Para sa Bayan" Program. This Program promotes an economic perspective predicated on the belief that development is the concern of the local community (defined as the local government units and civil society). Under this perspective, the national government’s role is limited to facilitation and providing technical, as well as, financial support towards economic and related initiatives identified by the local community stakeholders. The Program likewise promotes the full implementation of the Local Government Code, with emphasis on strengthening the de-centralization of LGUs and the institutionalization of participatory mechanisms involving local civil society. It also promotes the protection of the Constitutional provisions on economic nationalism.

The other hat he wears is that of being the Chief Executive Officer of Preferred Ventures, Inc., a private consultancy firm engaged in assisting LGUs in floating City/Municipal bonds. These bonds represent concrete projects identified, designed and promoted by the LGU concerned without any assistance or guarantee from the national government. It is a legal requirement that these bonds should not be of general application and that these bonds must be true revenue bonds - that the revenue generated from the identified project will be responsible for the liquidation of the bond when it reaches maturity. Preferred Ventures has been in this business for approximately 7 years now and was responsible for the first bond issue by an LGU (Urdaneta, Pangasinan) dedicated to the construction of a municipal slaughter house.

They entered into this business in line with their perception that the future of the Philippine economy requires a shift in the national government’s economic strategy. They believe that the national government must move from the promotion of national or macro projects to one promoting micro projects in every individual community. This is how we should fight globalization - localization is our best defense. The biggest symptom indicative of the mistake in our national economic strategy is the volume of OFWs that leave our country annually.

How do we actualize this new strategy? The first portion of the formula is to assist the OFW (wherever they may be found) and their families, who are left behind in the Philippines. The second portion is to develop the country and its economy so that Filipino workers will not have to seek employment abroad. How can we marry these two? The answer is to make use of the resources generated by OFWs and direct this to the development of local economies where they belong.

The current national strategy – inviting transnational corporations to invest and set-up in our country to spur economic activity has not worked. These transnational corporations are not driven with a sense of mission to help our country’s economy but are here to take advantage of opportunities that we willingly offer. They are in the business of betting on horses that will win. The other myth in our national strategy is the belief that putting-up export oriented industries is a solution to our woes. This is an illusion. They had put together the 1994 statistical data (this year was selected because of its data completeness) of all export industries, defined as industries that export 30% or more of its outputs, to determine how much income they actually paid to communities where they are set-up. To their surprise, these export industries contributed only 4.3% of the total income of the communities.

He then proceeded to talk about the municipal bond floats that Preferred Ventures helped issue since its incorporation:

1. Tagaytay City Tourism Bonds for its Convention Center
    Project (Php 220 Million) – March, 2001
2. Boracay – Aklan provincial Bonds for its Boracay – Caticlan
    Jetty Port Project (Php 40 Million) – July, 1999
3. Puerto Princesa Green Bond for its Brgy. Mangingisda
    Socialized Housing Project (Php 320 Million) – February,
    2000
4. Masbate City “Aksyon Padayon” Bonds for its Fish
    Complex Project (Php 160 Million) – January, 2003
5. Urdaneta Municipal Bonds for its Municipal Abattoir Project
    (Php 25 Million) – May, 1999
6. Daraga Municipal Bonds for its Public Market Project (Php
    75 Million) – May, 2003
7. Caloocan City Katipunan Bonds (Series A to C) for its
    Public Market Project (Php 185 Million); City Hall Park
    Project (Php 225 Million); General Hospital Project (Php
    210 Million) – December, 2000.

Preferred Ventures has other bond float projects (with signed Memorandum of Agreements) in the pipeline involving other LGUs throughout the Philippines.

He then talked of the possibility of designing an OFW Trust Fund where investments from OFWs can be accumulated for investment in such LGU bonds and such other enterprises that will support the development of the local economies. The Board of Trustees of the Fund shall be composed solely of representatives selected by investing OFWs and supported by a secretariat. The Fund can also tap consultants/resource persons who can provide invaluable inputs related to areas where investments can be allocated in order that the vision of strong local economies can be realized.

J. Lunch Break


K. WORKSHOP 2: Action Plans/ Next Steps

The participants were divided into smaller groups to discuss and present in plenary their conclusions on the following questions:


L. CLOSURE- Mr. Ding F. Bagasao, ERCOF Phils.

Mr. Bagasao began by acknowledging and thanking various individuals and institutions for their time and efforts in bringing the conference to a successful fruition, namely:

1. The Ercof Board of Trustees, who individually and sometimes, in representation of their organizations, contributed time, resources and inputs in the preparatory meetings and discussions, followup of resource persons and presentors, and various other related activities.
2. The Center for Local and Regional Governance(CLRG), headed by Dr. Alex Brillantes and Mike Tumanut,, as well as the UP School for Public Administration(thru Dr. Vicente Mariano) for their invaluable efforts in finetuning the program format and invitation of local government participants in the conference
3. The Executive Director and staff of Community Organisers Multiversity(COM), which provided Secretariat Services before and during the conference, for organizing the various facilitators and documentors, and the multifarious logistical requirements that anticipated and adequately met the participants and conference needs.
4. The Philippine German Development Foundation(Philgerfund), particularly its Executive Director, Mr. Ben Maata, who despite the heavy burdens of supervising logistical onsite needs, prepared and delivered a comprehensive and orderly summation of the workshop inputs; and his staff, for acting as liaison with the IIRR, and providing valuable on-site secretariat, logistical services and participant needs.
5. Mr. Jeremaiah Opiniano and Ms. Ellene Sana, who acted as facilitators for the two days, and to the participants who acted as workshop facilitators and documentors- Ms. Emma Lim Sandrino of FPSDC, Mr. Mike Tumanut of CLRG, Mr. Vic Arguelles of DBP, Dr. Vic Mariano of the UP School of Public Administration, Ms. Tess Ramiro of Akkapka-CANV, Myrna Cabamalan of Sarilaya, Mr. Guia Goduco of Radio Veritas, and Ditas Dabasol, Boy Marcelino and Jinggoy of COM, and Prof. Ed Layug of Xavier University.
6. To Mr. Serafin(Serf) Reyes of the Foundation of Developmental Video, for producing and conceptualizing the video(Voices of an OFW) which visually provided the proper tone for the conference; to Mr. Bernardo Bernie Lopez of Business World, who provided additional footage and shots of the conference and workshops;
7. The keynote speaker, the Mayor of Silang, and the various resource speakers and presentors who individually and as a whole, provided the meat and substance of the conference theme, as well as suggested various directions or starting points for Ercof and participants to implement the action agenda. Tokens of appreciation were also given to said resource speakers.
8. To the Atikha Theater Group composed of children of migrants in Mabini, Batangas, which provided a live and artistic expression of their concerns during the first night of the conference;
9. To the participants who without exception, actively contributed their valuable inputs in the proceedings as well as in the workshops.

Mr. Bagasao then offered his own observations on the substance of the conference:

1. As a followup to the Davao Conference, whose chief purpose was for awareness raising and gauging public consciousness on the potential of migration for development, Silang presented not only general directions on how migrants remittances could be maximized for the benefit of migrants’ families and local development, but also specific mechanisms that are being worked on that will hopefully lead to organized (as opposed to individual)savings and investment instruments which will have economies of scale to effect a significant impact on local economies.
2. He pointed out that problems of Overseas Filipinos that were already highlighted in Davao, such as neglect by government on the plight of OFWs, the social costs, as well as inefficiency in the delivery of services by OWWA, were echoed anew in Silang. Mr. Bagasao said that these problems could be considered as obstacles facing efforts by OFs in maximizing their earnings, and which participants discussed and sought to address by strengthening and organizing a lobby group that will dialogue with government for reforms along these areas, including the fielding of candidates for party list-migrant sector.
3. Mr. Bagasao briefly updated the participants about the ongoing and future programs of Ercof specifically on partnerships with microfinance institutions and the formation of an OFW trust fund for development, including the issuance of lgu level bonds to be offered to Ofs or to regional organizations,being designed by financial managers led by Dr. Sixto K Roxas.
4. Mr. Bagasao gave due recognition to the presence of about 12 OFW cooperatives whose membership consisted of returned OFWs and migrant family members, who came from different far flung provinces and indicated their strong and serious commitment to explore with ERCOF and its partners, ways by which economic linkaging could be achieved. In turn, Mr. Bagasao reiterated Ercof’s mandate of acting as a service provider, although not a funder, and serving as link between these coops and other service providers.
5. He closed by expressing the hope that from thereon, Ercof would be engaging more in activities than in conferences. He concluded by thanking Novib and the Peace and Equity Foundation for sharing Ercof’s vision, through their expressions of support through the funding of the various needs of the conference, and to Novib for funding of Ercof’s future programs.

M. Caucus of OFW Coops.

Some representatives of OFW coops who attended the conference requested Ercof for further discussion on their needs and concerns. Thus a meeting was held at 8pm of 18 July to 1:00 am of the following day, between Ercof officers Bagasao, Tanchoco, Maata, Arguelles and Opiniano, with OFW coop reps from Basilan, Western Samar, Cebu City and Mandaue, Quirino, Davao City, and two development NGOS from Bislig, Surigao and Kalumonan(Davao Oriental, a representative of the Kapisanan ng Migranteng Pilipino(Japan based) and a representative of COMultiversity.

1. Representatives of OFW coops and ngos went through the rounds again of their needs, concerns, problems as well as expectations on the theme of the conference and on service providers such as Ercof, that may have been left out during the conference. These needs consisted mostly on accessing services that may be offered in government as well as by funding or private development agencies which have not been forthcoming or they have been aware of, such as sources of funding, skills training and capability building.
2. Ercof officers again stressed that it is not a funding agency, as might have been perceived earlier, but is essentially a think-tank, advocate and service provider for migrant Filipinos and in the area of economic linkaging. They stressed that it is willing to assist OFW coops and ngos performing migrant services, but that it has to be the OFW coop or ngo who should do their own needs assessment and thereafter Ercof may help later by finding other organizations within its network who could match their needs.
3. A suggestion from the OFW coops was made to form a federation among them and pursue common concerns. Ercof pointed out that if this is what they believe the most effective way of achieving their objectives, the first thing they might wish to do was to improve their communications link, and on this, Ercof said it will try to find ways to help them along this line. It was suggested that they open email addresses, and later on, Ercof might try to help them get computers.
4. A discussion ensued on how to enlist the interest of local government units in migrant socio-economic activities. It was decided by the OFW coops, and concurred in by Ercof, that the group initiate letters of endorsement addressed to the DILG, for it to issue a circular to all local government units to give a special focus or attention to the needs of OFWs or their families within their respective territorial jurisdictions. The letters of endorsement would be prepared by the respective OFW coops and sent to Ercof, which will in turn submit the same and follow up with the Secretary of the DILG.

 


 

Copyright © 2004. Economic Resource Center For Overseas Filipinos. All rights reserved.